Select language, opens an overlay

Comment

Apr 06, 2017
the weather changes in this book, caused by past real people showed some imagination and wicked (and twisted) "bad guys". I could live with that. BUT the ARK OF THE COVENANT, most closely associated with King David in the Bible, was written in this book as if it was merely a myth or suggestion of a relic. That premise and placing the psychotic twins in the line of heritage, yet they were not Levis, or in any way related to Biblical characters, as descendants of The Ark is such a PERVERTED AND TWISTED WAY TO REPRESENT AN RELIC THAT IS RECOGNIZED TO BE PART OF BIBLICAL HISTORY. It's like doing the same to Noah's ark or The Cross of Christ. The above ruined the whole book for me. It makes me question ever reading their books again. What will they choose to twist next time? Is it worth reading 500 pages to find out?